The Adam Debate

Two takes on the ongoing discussion of the historical Adam issue:

Very Poythress has an extended defense of the traditional view. He has some scientific background, so I expect this is one of the most aware and competent presentations of this view.

Daniel Kirk, of Fuller, argues for the opposing position.

I appreciate well-argued discussions that help clarify the issues. I don’t think this debate is close to the end!

 

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: